|
By: Richard B. Rogers, PE During the recent Transportation Research Board meeting, Katie A. Larsen, University of Texas at Austin, reported some interesting findings regarding her studies in asphalt-rubber permeable friction courses (PFC). During the Distress Analysis Work Group Committee meeting her preliminary findings indicated that unacceptably high levels of zinc were present in the runoff water. These elevated zinc levels were not found in an adjacent PFC that did not contain rubber. Apparently the zinc leaches out of the rubber in the PFC and exceeded maximum thresholds after prolonged dry periods. This creates a problematic issue, because it is my understanding that the rubber/latex is needed to improve the noise reduction and the long-term performance that the asphalt-rubber PFC is touted for.
"This blog was previously posted in the Cement Council of Texas' "Texas Cement and Concrete Blog" (now inactive) and was carried forward to the current blog ("Cementx Pavement Blog") as it contains content that may be of interest to the reader".
2 Comments
3/2/2017 01:36:06 am
Do you have some referrals that I can find good rubber machines/equipment? 9/15/2018 01:34:45 am
Thank you for this submission. it is interesting and informative. Leave a Reply. |
PURPOSEThe Cementx Pavement Blog seeks to make pavement owners, engineers and contractors smarter about selecting, designing, constructing and maintaining pavements. New blog postings began February 1, 2017; however, we carried over pavement-related blog postings from our older blog, the "Texas Cement and Concrete Blog," which ran until December 2016.
AuthorsJan R. Prusinski, PE Category Filters
All
Archives
May 2019
|
RSS Feed
|
The Cement Council of Texas promotes the proper use of cement and concrete in pavements, infrastructure, buildings, homes and other construction applications. We are the non-profit trade association of portland cement manufacturers and shippers in Texas.
|
Subscribe for Updates!
|
The materials and information contained herein are for general guidance and reference purposes only for professionals competent to evaluate the significance and limitations of their content. The materials and information do not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Third party materials reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the accuracy of the facts, data, opinions, findings, and conclusions presented therein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Cement Council of Texas.