Cement Council of Texas
  • Home
  • Pavements
    • Airports
    • Highways
    • Industrial
    • Parking Lots
    • Pavement & Soil Stabilization
    • Streets
    • Trails
  • Calendar/Events
    • Calendar
  • News & Resources
    • News
    • Industry Links
    • Resources & Presentations
  • Blog
  • Projects
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • CCT Members
    • CCT Staff >
      • Richard B. Rogers, PE
      • Amy C. Swift
      • Nancy Aguirre Beltran, PhD., EIT
      • Randy Bowers, PE
    • Contact and Subscribe

Cementx Pavement Blog

RCC PRODUCTION: WHICH PLANT IS BEST?

12/31/2016

2 Comments

 
Picture
Twin-Shaft Continuous Pug Mill
By: Matthew W. Singel
​
Roller-Compacted Concrete (RCC) production for pavements raises many questions for the novice, from mix design, to admixtures, to plant equipment.  A common question is, “What equipment is best for producing/mixing RCC for pavements?”
Central Mix Concrete PlantCentral Mix Concrete Plant
The circumstances of each project dictate how best to produce and place RCC pavement.  There are many opinions on which concrete production equipment offers the best quality control, uniformity or flexibility.  Well maintained equipment is arguably more important than any other factor.  RCC has been successfully (and profitably) produced in the continuous pugmill, central mix concrete plant (drum mixed), dry batch plant (truck mixed), horizontal shaft mixer, and volumetric mix truck.  To complicate matters further, there are inserts, attachments, etc., that work with existing plants to optimize production rates, minimize segregation, maximize water (and admixture) distribution and more.  Confusing?  A common-sense approach is best in this situation.
A continuous pugmill or horizontal shaft mixer makes sense for larger projects that require high production rates (100+ cubic yards/hour) and relatively uninterrupted production.  Even a central mix plant can tout high production rates if dedicated to a large project. 
For moderate production rates, any ready-mix plant (central mix or dry batch) can produce RCC.  The dry batch plant measures and transfers materials for mixing in the ready-mix truck.  Once mixed, the RCC must be off-loaded into dump trucks for delivery.  Central mix and other plants discharge directly into the dump truck for transport to the paver.
Volumetric mix truck production rates vary significantly.  This type of truck can be described as a small truck-mounted pugmill.  For small quantities, these trucks can arrive loaded with all materials, mix/discharge a limited quantity and drive away.  For increased production, several trucks can operate side-by-side with a bucket loader feeding them from aggregate stockpiles.
Ultimately, the deciding factors include project size and schedule, available equipment and desired results.  A 20,000 or 30,000 square yard project can justify mobilizing a large, high-production plant that is dedicated to that project.
A local ready-mix producer, if capable of meeting productions rates, might not want to turn away long-term customers and dedicate all production to one large RCC project.  However, operating a second shift into the evening can be a very attractive option.
Smaller projects would often be too expensive if a large production plant was transported and erected.  However, the local ready-mix producer could dedicate three or four mixer trucks for an RCC project of this size without interrupting service to its other customers.  The dedicated trucks stay on the property mixing RCC and offloading into dump trucks for delivery.
RCC pavement can often be the cost-effective option with adequate communication and common sense throughout the project.
"This blog was previously posted in the Cement Council of Texas' "Texas Cement and Concrete Blog" (now inactive) and was carried forward to the current blog ("Cementx Pavement Blog") as it contains content that may be of interest to the reader".

2 Comments
Camelway Machinery link
3/12/2018 02:50:19 am

We provide 200 - 800 ton/h rcc mixing plant, more plz contact me.

Reply
Joey H. link
9/23/2018 12:46:24 pm

This is an interesting article comparing the different types of production methods for cement. I've found that having your own plant, although expensive (repairs, maintenance, etc) is worth the investment. You are in control of your products and the quantity (and quality) is up to you. For example, if you want to product split face block for a job, you can fill the order by producing it yourself. Great information!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Subscribe to Updates

    PURPOSE

    The Cementx Pavement Blog seeks to make pavement owners, engineers and contractors smarter about selecting, designing, constructing and maintaining pavements. New blog postings began February 1, 2017; however, we carried over pavement-related blog postings from our older blog, the "Texas Cement and Concrete Blog," which ran until December 2016.

    Authors

    Jan R. Prusinski, PE
    Executive Director

    Richard B. Rogers, PE
    Sr. Director, Concrete Pavements

    Matthew W. Singel
    ​Director, Soil-Cement and RCC Pavements

    Category Filters

    All
    Author: J R Prusinski
    Author: M W Singel
    Author: R B Rogers
    Cement Modified Soil
    Cement Treated Base
    Concrete Overlays
    Concrete Pavement
    Flexible Pavements/Asphalt
    Full Depth Reclamation
    Pavement Design
    RCC Pavements
    Structures And Homes
    Transportation Funding

    Archives

    May 2019
    January 2018
    July 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    June 2014
    April 2013
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    November 2011

Picture
​The Cement Council of Texas promotes the proper use of cement and concrete in pavements, infrastructure, buildings, homes and other construction applications.  We are the non-profit trade association of portland cement manufacturers and shippers in Texas.

Office: 817-281-6799
​Email: info@cementx.org
​© 2017 Cement Council of Texas
Subscribe for Updates!
    Name is optional
    By subscribing, the Cement Council of Texas will send occasional updates for events, blogs, and other content, averaging once to twice a month. You may unsubscribe any time.
Subscribe
The materials and information contained herein are for general guidance and reference purposes only for professionals competent to evaluate the significance and limitations of their content.  The materials and information do not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.  Third party materials reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the accuracy of the facts, data, opinions, findings, and conclusions presented therein.  The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Cement Council of Texas.
​​
  • Home
  • Pavements
    • Airports
    • Highways
    • Industrial
    • Parking Lots
    • Pavement & Soil Stabilization
    • Streets
    • Trails
  • Calendar/Events
    • Calendar
  • News & Resources
    • News
    • Industry Links
    • Resources & Presentations
  • Blog
  • Projects
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • CCT Members
    • CCT Staff >
      • Richard B. Rogers, PE
      • Amy C. Swift
      • Nancy Aguirre Beltran, PhD., EIT
      • Randy Bowers, PE
    • Contact and Subscribe